Match ˙(?/20) -- tester vs testee-2:0 (0/20), 2:1 (8/20), 1:2(15/20) , 0:2 (20/20)
Consistency (?/12) How do you feel did the deck work? Did I get good combos off, or couldn't the testee do anything special? Did it work how it is supposed to?
Number of cards (?/5) 40 cards(5/5), 41-42 (3/5), 43 cards (1/5) , 44-60(0/5)
Originality (?/7) Any tier 1 build is 1 or 0 points.Everything else is personal evaluation.
focus and attitude (?/7) personal evaluation.
Use of cards (?/19) Did he use his cards correctly? Did he understand effects and used them when appropriate? Or could he have achived a better result if he had played diffrently? When evaluating this give CLEAR and DETAILED information and examples. Don't just say "You should not summon this and that", say why not and what you would have done in their place!
Ruling questions (?/20) 5 questions each 4 points
Siding (?/10) What did he side and How was it good or bad for him
total (?/100)
- Spoiler:
Match ˙(?/20)
Consistency (?/12)
Number of cards (?/5)
Originality (?/7)
Use of cards (?/19)
focus and attitude (?/7)
Ruling questions (?/20)
Siding (?/12)
Total
Every test result must be detailed why you took him of a point.
If you want to complain about the tester then you have to have screenshots of his mistakes
1-60 Red
61-81 Yellow
82- 100 blue